From: celeste801@aol.com (Celeste801) Date: 18 Nov 1995 22:55:03 -0500 Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d Subject: Celestial Reviews 38 - Nov 19 Celestial Reviews 38 - Nov 18, 1995 Note: As I read the a.s.s. postings, I often find among the wannafucks a message or two bewailing the lamentable quality of stories on a.s.s. I honestly don't see the point these people are making. While I agree that there are numerous weak stories in the postings, there are also some really great stories on a.s.s. - enough to keep even the most prolific reader occupied during his/her relatively private sexual activities. The stories that I review in this issue are evidence of that high quality. In fact, I would venture to say that fully half of the stories that I am reviewing in this issue would be acceptable in good, reputable magazines, except that their content makes them unsuitable for general circulation. Even the weakest of today's stories is a highly creative endeavor that happens to be flawed by serious grammar mistakes; and I personally find it reassuring that so many writers on this newsgroup work so hard to remove errors in grammar and style from the stories they post here. I hope some of you keep that in mind when you read a good story. Our authors don't get paid - except in terms of the occasional feedback they get from readers. I now I enjoy friendly comments from my readers, and I imagine the other authors do too. Writing Celestial Reviews and related stuff has continued to be fun. The activity actually helps keep me sane - if that's possible. Now that I have reviewed my 300th story, I would like to comment on an interesting irony. When I first started writing these reviews, I used to draw on "normal" American and world literature to clarify points to the a.s.s audience. (For example, I have had a lot of fun developing the theory that Deirdre is Sherwood Anderson reincarnated - more on that in a future issue! Even if most of you don't know what I'm talking about, I did get a rise out of the only person in Clyde, Ohio, with an AOL account.) But last week the situation reversed itself: I found myself in front of a class of eager high school students and I wanted to take an idea from an a.s.s. story to clarify a point about "The Scarlet Letter." No can do! The paradox is that a large number of a.s.s. people (especially those who bother to communicate with me) are highly intelligent and creative. Dare I say it - some of them are even brighter and more creative than some of my colleagues in the Teachers' Lounge! I am finding the a.s.s. atmosphere in many cases to be more stimulating (no pun intended) than my ordinary academic life; and the result has been that I am (1) becoming a little more creative myself and (2) I can't tell anyone about this. Well, it *is* an irony. You can decide for yourself if it's interesting. - Celeste "Experiment" by Deirdre (mind control) 10 "Field" by Deirdre (I'm not sure) 9 "Fixup" by Deirdre (voyeurism) 5 "Walk" by Deirdre (outdoor sex & voyeurism) 8 "Droit du Signeur" by Lysander (history & romance) 10 "Wet Dream" by Caesar (sex in the great outdoors) 5 "Taking Chances" by Frank McCoy (incest with very young child) 7 "NICE" by Vickie Tern (revenge & kinky sex) 10 "Experiment" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). Ah! Another mad scientist is at work in the laboratory of Deirdre's mind. This one finds out that one of her female students is attracted to a cheerleader, and the scientist promises to turn the cheerleader over as a sex slave if only the student will make love to the mad scientist. Sounds good? Read on! (Rating: 10) "Field" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). A college girl shares an apartment with her girlfriend. The girlfriend acquires a boyfriend, and he moves in with them. The boyfriend and girlfriend split up, and the girlfriend goes home to mother, leaving the original girl and the former boyfriend living together - but not sexually involved. The boyfriend decides to play the field for a while. Pretty soon there are women marching in and out of the boyfriend's room. This confuses the original girl, because the boyfriend strikes her as rather bland. Pretty soon the boyfriend's women are multiplying faster than rabbits with calculators and are overflowing the apartment. Then the girlfriend comes back and asks if the boyfriend has been seeing anyone. This story certainly held my attention! (Rating: 9) "Fixup" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). The boss's wife seems to be jealous of the female employee. She invites the employee over and tries to fix her up with a date. When the boss takes the employee home, they double back and peek in through the window and see the wife and the other young man making out. Just when the story starts, it stops! It certainly leaves a lot to the imagination. (Rating: 5) "Walk" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). "It's so dark and lonely out here at 3:00 a.m. that I could dance naked in the street and no one would notice!" That's not the sort of thing a woman says out loud in a Deirdre story - at least not unless she expects some consequences. (Rating: 8) "Droit du Signeur" by Lysander (Lysander@vnet.net). This posting of Chapter 8 represents what I'll call the rejuvenation of one of my favorite long stories. In my original review of this story, I reported being wonderfully excited at its beginning and then disappointed as it seemed to loose its steam. Eventually, it just seemed to stop. Lysander reports that he had written the beginning of a garden rendezvous between Tomas and Esmerelda immediately after she leaves Kirsten and Heinrich in Chapter 6. It was supposed to be tender and uplifting, a life-affirming act between two people who needed each other; but it was also incredibly cloying. Nevertheless, he stubbornly stuck with that plan from the middle of '93 until two nights before he posted Chapter 8. Then he took a 90-degree turn and it practically wrote itself. The result is much darker than he had intended, and it will be interesting to see how the story eventually fulfills its original potential HERE'S WHAT I HOPE: I hope Lysander breaks with the a.s.s. tradition of "improving" stories by just adding new chapters. He wrote four brilliant chapters and then three chapters that seriously limped. Instead of just adding eight more chapters, he should go back at some time and revise the weak chapters. In some aspects of life it is necessary to live with our mistakes and to correct old weaknesses by merely adding new strengths; but this is not necessary with electronic publishing. All an author has to do is revise an old chapter and push a button and the bad parts of the story are gone and the story becomes much better. The only authors I know of on a.s.s. who consistently do this are Backrub and the Ng Sisters. These are some of the best authors on the newsgroup: there's a lesson in this. The elderly among you will perhaps remember the old "Dallas" TV series. The writers of that series wrote once themselves into a corner when they killed a major character. Then the character came back to life the next season, and they tried to reconcile this contradiction by saying that the death had been only a dream. Since evening soap viewers are not as sophisticated as a.s.s. readers, this approach worked. But on the Internet this approach is not even necessary. It's perfectly fair to simply revise the earlier episodes - don't kill OJ or JR or whoever in the first place. Lysander has some serious weaknesses and contradictions in Chapters 5 through 7. If he both (1) finishes the story and (2) gets rid of these problems, he will have written one of the best sex stories ever. Let me be clear about one thing: Lysander is already one of the best and most versatile authors on a.s.s. He doesn't just repeat one plot with minor variations; his stories range from the thrilling and even brutal to the sentimental. I have given him high ratings for other stories. But this story has the potential to be his very best - IF he will revise it as well as finish it. The reason I am saying this in a public review instead of in a private letter to the author is because numerous other writers can benefit from the same advice. Consider revising and altering your stories to improve them when you repost them. I advocate treating the stories like successive versions of computer software. I eventually want to see Droit du Signeur 2.0. This strategy has worked for Bill Gates and for numerous software developers. Believe me; it will work here too. Anyway, since Lysander has reposted the original episodes, here is my original review: Nice story! That was my reaction after I read the first chapter and plunged ahead into the second. This tale takes place in Germany during feudal times. In those days the lord of the serfs had the right to have sexual relations with a new bride on her wedding night. The hero and heroine in this story initially resist this as a barbaric custom; but eventually they comply. This story borders on greatness. At the end of the third chapter, I was truly impressed. But then the author gets sidetracked on tales about warfare and torture. These chapters are not bad; in fact they're good - but perhaps a little too detailed. The problem is that the author never gets back to a full treatment of the sex and romance. All of a sudden the story just ends, and we are informed that Heinrich married Esmerelda (who is barren) after miraculously rescuing her from Assan and that Kirsten will have Heinrich's baby. There's a lot more room for development and resolution here. For example, how will Tomas (Kirsten's husband) react to this state of affairs, and how does Kirsten feel about her husband? When sex occurs, it is really hot. In addition, the plot allows room for real sexual tension and creative character development. Assume that there really is a rule that the lord gets the bride on the wedding night and that the bride can help her husband (who has attacked the lord) only by making the lord as happy as possible. She expects the lord to be an asshole; but instead he turns out to be a responsible ruler and kind lover, whose happiness apparently arises from making her happy. How should she react? There's an important moral and emotional angle here, which is worth developing: should she let herself go and enjoy the pleasures she has been offered, or should she hold back her true affection for her husband? If she does react favorably to the lord and if she does conceive a child, how will this affect her love for her husband? And then there's Esmerelda.... These and many other dilemmas could make this into a story that is not only titillating, but also just plain good literature. The author starts with a great plot for the first few chapters - a plot that involves real personalities - and then settles for a war story, purely hormonal sex, and an ending that leaves us hanging. At the beginning, this story reminded me a lot of the movie "Indecent Proposal," in which Demi Moore's husband was offered a million dollars if he would let her sleep with a rich guy who looked a lot like Robert Redford. But "Indecent Proposal" maintained the moral and potential ambivalence all the way to the end of the story. In addition, Demi Moore's sexual activity was not purely hormonal. I hope the author of this story realizes what he has here and goes back and turns it into the work of art it could become. (Rating: 7) "Wet Dream" by Caesar (jsharpe@access.awinc.com). This is a really weak presentation of a really interesting idea. An older adolescent boy comes upon a younger adolescent girl in the woods. She starts to masturbate but becomes aware that someone is watching. The boy remains unseen but gives the girl instructions to continue masturbating. The problem with the story is that it is full of simple grammatical errors that are terribly distracting. I simply do not understand why creative authors cannot take the trouble to make their stories presentable before releasing them to a wider audience. (Rating: 5) "Taking Chances" by Frank McCoy (mccoyf@millcomm.com). Here we have a story about a man with a frigid wife and a hot daughter whom he starts humping when she is nine years old. The wife is actually a nice person, whom both the husband and daughter love, and so they try to be discreet. But then it becomes obvious that the wife, who is sterile, is thrilled at the idea of the little girl becoming pregnant by the father. This heats up everyone's sex life. Eventually the family visits an unnamed, utopian city in an unspecified, out-of-the-way part of the United States, where down home hospitality is a way of life, where incest is the norm, and where Mom, Dad, and Marlene could raise their children/grandchildren in blissful harmony. The sad thing is that they leave this Walden-like paradise behind; but the good news is that Mom's sex drives are coming alive, and they always have the 800 number of the Society For the Preservation of Incest in America. I guess if we function in a science fiction world where there's no such thing as harm from genetic inbreeding and where nine-year-olds suffer no psychological trauma from being boinked by their daddies but actually have their personalities enriched by becoming pregnant before they are teenagers, then this is a kinda sexy story. I might add that in real life if I clearly believed that this was happening to a child for whom I was teaching I would be required by law in my state to report my suspicions to an appropriate agency. I have no problem with this law. As an educator I am aware of the very real effects that genetic inbreeding can have on the intellectual ability of the cute little offspring of incestuous matings. (The problem is one of increased probability of double recessive genes, which would be much less likely to occur among unrelated sex partners. People often make crude jokes about parts of the country in which fathers are reputed to have children by their daughters; and while these jokes are certainly rude, they are not entirely fiction.) In addition, in real life (as opposed to this story) incestuous relationships often do entail an abusive use of power that results in personality dysfunctions. I've seen these very real results and am not amused by them. The preceding paragraph does not mean that I think the author is a pervert or that this is a bad story. In my American literature classes I require my students to read a short story about a maniac who kills an old man because he doesn't like the ways his eye looks, then chops up his body and buries it under the floor, and then sits on top of those very floorboards and casually talks to the police officers until the beating of the telltale heart becomes so loud that he blurts out that he committed the crime. I require them to read another story by the same author in which a man gets revenge on his enemy by burying him alive in a wine cellar. I have a colleague (more sinister than myself) who requires his students to read a novel about a man with an incredibly insipid personality and vacuous system of morality who is nonetheless labeled as Great in the novel's title. I have even tried to get my students to read a lengthy tome about a blasphemous ship captain who sails around the world and has nearly his entire crew killed while he tries to get revenge on a huge mammal that he incorrectly refers to as a fish. Need I go on? My point is that many of the finest leaders of our nation have read and enjoyed these stories without being corrupted by them. I am not so blase as to believe that there is no potential for harm in this story. Nor am I putting this story on a level with the stories to which I have alluded (except, of course, "The Great Gatsby"). What I am saying is that I think we can agree that reasonable readers should be able to read a well written story and refrain from imitating obviously inappropriate and socially destructive behaviors. I know I can. In fact, in the many years since I have read Poe, I have buried alive only two people (not counting lawyers and a lexicographer); and both of them were English professors anyway. As for the author - I doubt that he's really a pervert. In fact, I would be willing to let him babysit for my own children, as long as the surveillance cameras were working. But I digress. The story was clearly written and fairly creative. There were points at which it got to be just too much to believe, and toward the end it began to sound like an infomercial or a chamber of commerce pamphlet; but on the whole I found the story to be interesting. Just remember: you can go to jail for doing things like this. (Rating: 7) "NICE" by Vickie Tern (vickietern@aol.com). The title refers (among other things) to the fact that the husband wanted to be nice to his wife by engaging with her only in the nice kind of sex she wanted, which was generally placid and rare. Away from home he was selected as a sexual playmate by a coworker with decidedly anti-nice tendencies. That torrid and kinky affair came to an end and vanished into the past. However, from the very beginning of the story we know that the man's wife is a vindictive sort: to her a deal is a deal; and if she'll sue the painter for finishing a job late, we can just bet that she won't be very nice to a husband found to be unfaithful to the marriage deal. Now my Word Count utility tells me that I am 2929 words (259 lines) into a story that is 10858 words (1022 lines) long, and the wife has just found out that this sweet little husband has been unfaithful. As you know, I like sweet cuddly sex; and I don't like stories in which someone is humiliated sexually. And you must certainly realize that if my husband were ever similarly unfaithful to me, I would simply pat him on the head, ask him not to do it again, and beg his forgiveness for failing to be the woman he deserved. If you believe that, then you're a few french fries short of a Happy Meal and I have a snippet of Princess Di's cunt hair that I'm willing to sell you at a bargain price. Au contraire! This author has my permission to have the wife do anything she wants to this slimeball for the rest of the story; and I'm going to enjoy all 7929 words (763 lines) of it! And the plan for revenge that the wife outlines is ingenious. I've never thought of this method of revenge before. As the wife dictated her terms to the husband, I couldn't help thinking that the plot rivaled an Edgar Alan Poe story in its macabre thoroughness. But hark! The story has a surprise ending; and that's putting it mildly. I cannot tell you more. Read this story. You'll love it. (Rating: 10) TIP OF THE WEEK: In each issue of Celestial Reviews I present one of the guidelines from Celestial Grammar, which I have posted on alt sex.stories.d. and which I'll continue to develop and revise from time to time. My theory is that if all of these tips were followed, about 95% of the really distracting errors in a.s.s. stories would be eliminated. (The other 5% will eventually be covered in Advanced Celestial Grammar.) I was going to name this part of the column TIP OF THE {something sexual}, but I thought the innuendo might detract from the sober serious business at hand. Here is this week's tip: THE SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD In the present tense the subjunctive is usually the infinitive of the verb (that is, the form of the verb listed in the dictionary). In the past tense the subjunctive looks just like any other past tense, except for "were," which is the past subjunctive of "to be." The subjunctive mood states a requirement, a desire, or a suggestion; or it states a condition that is contrary to fact. The previous sentences make the subjunctive sound harder than it really is. The following examples will probably sound natural to native speakers of English. His wife suggested that he fuck himself. {suggestion} His wife requested that he lick her cunt. {suggestion} I insist that you be here for supper if you expect me to eat you out afterwards. {Requirement} I wish that I were a more competent cunnilinguist. {Desire} If I were you, I would be in love with me. {Condition contrary to fact} There are really only two problems with the subjunctive. First, many writers don't know about the subjunctive or feel uncomfortable with it, and so they "talk around" it. For example, instead of the first example they may say: His wife suggested that he should fuck himself. {suggestion} This is not actually a mistake; it just misses the opportunity to use the subjunctive, which I think is a little more elegant. The second problem is a little more serious: many writers tend to use "was" instead of "were." For example, in the fourth example they may say I wish that I was a more competent cunnilinguist. {Desire} If someone says this to you, the socially appropriate response would be to make a quick estimate of whether you want this person to give you a demonstration. If he/she looks like a major turn-off, reply "You mean 'were.' That's the subjunctive mood." The person will leave you alone. On the other hand, if he/she looks like a promising prospect, just reply Let me help you practice. In some cases, the misuse of "was" for "were" actually gives the sentence a different meaning. If Melissa was behind the curtain with a gun, she could have stopped her sister from fucking him. {This sentence suggests that Melissa was actually behind the curtain and therefore could have taken the designated action.} If Vicky were behind the curtain with a gun, she could have stopped her sister from fucking him. {This sentence clearly means that Vicky wasn't behind the curtain, but she could have taken this action if she would have been there.} If you want to use a more elegant expression, you can even omit the "If" and convey the idea by using the subjunctive with an altered word order. For example, the preceding example could become: Were Vicky behind the curtain with a gun, she could have stopped her sister from fucking him. {This sentence clearly means that Vicky wasn't behind the curtain, but she could have taken this action if she would have been there.} It's good to know about this usage, because when you use it people know you're making an unusual point. {Shakespeare does this effectively in Julius Caesar, III, ii, 237-239: "Were I Brutus, and Brutus Antony, there were an Antony would ruffle up your spirits....} It lets the listener know you're "in the mood." This line has worked for me: Were you as good a lover as Pierce Brosnan, your tongue would be moving a little faster right now. Use this approach sparingly.